Header graphic for print

MoFo Reenforcement

The Enforcement Blog

CFPB Requests Comment on Overdraft Rule

Posted in CFPB, Electronic Payments, Regulatory Developments

On May 15, 2019, the CFPB published a Request for Comment on the Regulation E provisions that require consumers to opt in to overdraft fees on one-time debit card and ATM transactions. The Request for Comment is made under the Regulatory Flexibility Act, which requires an agency to review rules within 10 years after their adoption.

Read our client alert.

CFPB Proposes New Rules to Modernize Debt Collection

Posted in CFPB, Regulatory Developments

On May 7, 2019, the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB) issued proposed rules (“Proposed Rules”) under the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act (FDCPA) and its authority under the Dodd-Frank Act. If finalized, the Proposed Rules will be the first substantive regulations for debt collection practices since the FDCPA was enacted in 1977. The Proposed Rules would clarify the application of the FDCPA to current market conditions, most notably by permitting the use of text messages, emails, and social media to communicate with debtors. At the same time, the Proposed Rules would address concerns about traditional means of communication, such as phone calls and voice mail messages.

Read our client alert.

Home Mortgage Disclosure Act Amendments: CFPB Issues Two Regulation C Releases

Posted in Fair Lending, Mortgage, Regulatory Developments

On May 2, 2019, the CFPB issued two releases related to Regulation C, which implements the Home Mortgage Disclosure Act (HMDA). The CFPB released a notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM) to adjust Regulation C’s loan volume thresholds that trigger HMDA and to make other changes. Comments are due 30 days after publication in the Federal Register. The CFPB also released an advance notice of proposed rulemaking (ANPR) seeking comment on whether it should propose to revise the data elements that covered institutions must report.

Comments are due 60 days from publication in the Federal Register.

Read our client alert.

Could Strong Consumer Authentication Weaken Consumer Demand?

Posted in Electronic Payments, Regulatory Developments

From 14 September 2019, certain electronic and remote payments must be subjected to two-factor, or “strong customer authentication”, under regulatory standards covering the European Economic Area relating to the second EU Payment Services Directive, which took effect in January 2018. Retailers are uncertain whether these new European anti-fraud measures will cause consumers to abandon online purchases. Read our client alert for guidance on transactions that might be impacted or exempt.

Read our client alert.

In a First, FinCEN Assesses Civil Money Penalty Against Peer-to-Peer Virtual Currency Exchanger

Posted in Enforcement Actions, Regulatory Developments

The Financial Crimes Enforcement Network (“FinCEN”) issued a press release announcing a civil money penalty for violations of the Bank Secrecy Act against Eric Powers, an individual who acted as a peer-to-peer virtual currency exchanger. The enforcement action is the first-ever penalty assessed by FinCEN against a peer-to-peer virtual currency exchanger. Our alert discusses this recent action by FinCEN and its implications.

Read our client alert.

Federal Reserve Proposes New Control Regulations

Posted in Regulatory Developments

The Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System  released a proposed rule to revise regulations related to the determination of “control” under the Bank Holding Company Act (“BHC Act”) and the Home Owners’ Loan Act. The Proposed Rule would incorporate existing interpretations under the “controlling influence” prong of the control definition into Federal Reserve regulations and would make certain adjustments to historical Federal Reserve practice in this area.

Read our client alert.

Banking Agencies Propose a More Tiered Approach to Large Foreign Bank Supervision

Posted in Regulatory Developments

On April 8, 2019, the federal banking agencies released two proposals which, if adopted, would further tailor the approach to supervision of large foreign banking organizations (FBOs). For FBOs with a more significant U.S. presence, the proposals would establish categories for the application of requirements based on size and certain other risk-based indicators. These categories would parallel the tailored framework proposed for the supervision of large domestic banking organizations released in November 2018.

Read our client alert.

Federal Reserve and FDIC Issue Proposed Changes to Resolution Plan Requirements for Foreign and Domestic Banking Organizations

Posted in Regulatory Developments

On April 8 and 16, 2019, the Federal Reserve and the FDIC published proposed changes to resolution plan (or “living will”) requirements applicable to U.S. and foreign banking organizations. The regulatory changes are necessary because the 2018 Regulatory Relief Act raised the asset thresholds for applicability of the living will requirements. The proposal would apply different filing frequency and informational content requirements based on the risk a firm poses to the U.S. financial system.

Read our client alert.

Unanimous but Narrow SCOTUS Ruling on Fair Debt Collection Practices Act

Posted in Foreclosure, Mortgage, Regulatory Developments

On March 20, 2019, the Supreme Court unanimously ruled in Obduskey v. McCarthy & Holthus LLP that a business engaged in non-judicial foreclosure is not subject to all of the requirements and prohibitions applicable to “debt collectors” under the Fair Debt Collections Practices Act. We discuss The Supreme Court’s decision and how this ruling is limited to situations where a business’s actions are required by state law governing enforcement of security interests.

Read our client alert.

Financial Services Report – Spring 2019

Posted in Arbitration, CFPB, Credit Cards, Credit Reports, Electronic Payments, Enforcement Actions, Fair Lending, Investigations, Mobile Payments, Mortgage, Payday Lending, Preemption, Privacy, Regulatory Developments, State Regulators, Student Lending

In the words of Willie Wonka: “Wait a minute — strike that, reverse it!” As loyal readers will recall, in our last issue, we tried to stay current in referring to the CFPB by what Mick Mulvaney declared would be its new name: the Bureau of Consumer Financial Protection. Well, what a difference a director makes. Shortly after Kathy Kraninger was confirmed by the Senate as the second Director of the agency, she scrapped the name change. We’ll wait to see what happens to the big “bcfp” sign in the lobby of the CFPB’s headquarters! Since Kraninger was confirmed we’ve seen the Bureau issue its first consent orders since former Director Cordray resigned. CFPB-watchers have noted that only one of these consent orders included restitution. A change in direction? A sub rosa recognition of self-reporting and self-remediation? We’ll have to wait and see.

This quarter also brought an about-face by the CFPB on part of the controversial small-dollar loan rule. Consumer advocates and industry trade groups alike are threatening suit on different parts of the proposed rule. Does that indicate it’s a good compromise? Again, we’ll have to wait and see.

Read on to catch up on these and other developments in Washington, D.C. and beyond.

Read our newsletter.